Uber and Lyft Sexual Assault Cases: The Role of GPS and App Data in Litigation
Speak with an ExpertCV Download
In recent years, litigation involving sexual assault claims against Uber and Lyft has increased. These cases often hinge on precisely when and where certain events occurred. That’s where mobile app metadata, GPS coordinates, and telecommunications data become critical. Understanding the timing, routing, and functionality of app features can significantly impact liability, causation, and damages analysis in both civil and insurance defense contexts.
Discovery Engineering specializes in analyzing this type of technical evidence, particularly when mobile apps, GPS systems, and wireless protocols are central to the claims. Their work has provided clear and fact-based evidence to several rideshare-related lawsuits, especially where timing disputes or location discrepancies are involved.
How GPS Data Is Used to Reconstruct Events
When a rider reports an assault, a common issue is whether the driver deviated from the expected route or prolonged the trip beyond what was necessary. These questions require accurate mapping of trip start and end times, route progression, and stops. Uber and Lyft apps log GPS data at regular intervals, but the granularity and consistency of these logs vary based on app version, device settings, and backend server synchronization.
An electrical engineer expert witness can verify GPS coordinate sequences, compare them against known map data, and identify whether gaps exist that might raise questions about driver behavior. In one case, GPS data showed a prolonged stop mid-ride, which contradicted the driver’s claim that the trip was uninterrupted. This was a turning point in establishing opportunity and causation.
Analyzing App Metadata and Message Timing
Beyond GPS, Uber and Lyft apps generate detailed metadata: timestamps of ride acceptance, trip start, drop-off, driver-passenger messages, and the use of safety features like the panic button. These logs reside both on the rider’s and driver’s phones and in company servers. Matching them up can be difficult, especially when data has been deleted, altered, or partially retained.
Discovery Engineering often begins with a forensic image of the mobile device. From there, they extract and correlate app logs with operating system-level records (such as background activity and network logs). For example, the moment a ride was accepted and when the vehicle actually started moving can be compared to verify delay claims or unaccounted time intervals. In another matter, log timestamps disproved a defendant’s claim that the passenger initiated a destination change mid-ride. These findings can shape deposition strategy or even support a dispositive motion.
Understanding Data Integrity and Reliability
Attorneys may assume app logs and GPS records are accurate and complete, but that’s not always the case. Factors like phone signal loss, delayed network synchronization, and device caching behaviors can create discrepancies. A cell phone might report a driver at a certain location several seconds—or even minutes—after they were actually there.
That’s why Discovery Engineering conducts cross-validation using cellular data analysis, known as call detail records (CDRs), and tools like Google Location History when available. This layered approach helps confirm whether location and timing data are internally consistent. Without this level of scrutiny, critical assumptions about liability can go unchallenged.
How Engineering Analysis Affects Legal Strategy
Many of these cases involve claims of negligent hiring or supervision, failure to warn, or unsafe product design. For example, plaintiffs may argue that the Uber or Lyft app failed to provide adequate safeguards—such as real-time monitoring or alerts during unexpected stops. Defense teams must then address whether such failures were technically foreseeable, avoidable, or causally related to the alleged harm.
Engineering analysis provides an objective basis to evaluate these issues. In one active case, Discovery Engineering evaluated Uber app behavior during an assault scenario. Their findings revealed that the app did not trigger its safety alert feature despite a sudden stop and route deviation. This analysis became central to arguments about product design defect and failure to warn.
Key Questions Attorneys Should Consider
1. Where Was the Vehicle, Really?
Map reconstruction and GPS logs must be correlated with server-side and device-side data to determine true location at specific time points.
2. Was the App Functioning as Intended?
App version, device model, and operating system logs can show whether critical features like panic buttons or route monitoring tools were used or failed to activate.
3. Can the Data Be Trusted?
Was there any data loss, delay, or manipulation? Only a layered technical approach can validate whether timestamps and coordinates are reliable under evidentiary standards.
Technical Evidence That Withstands Scrutiny
Expert witness testimony grounded in engineering principles—not conjecture—is crucial when explaining technical data. Discovery Engineering applies signal processing methods, time synchronization techniques, and device behavior analysis to ensure evidence can survive cross-examination. Our work is guided by industry standards for GPS analysis, mobile system logging, and data retention protocols.
Understanding how to interpret technical GPS and app data is increasingly important in rideshare litigation. Discovery Engineering provides fact-based analysis that helps courts and counsel understand complex data related to timing, location, and system functionality.
