Electrical Engineering Expert Witness Testimony in Utility Line Incidents
Speak with an ExpertCV Download
Understanding the Role of Engineering in Utility Infrastructure Litigation
When litigation arises from a utility-related incident—whether due to electrocution, infrastructure failure, or damage caused by downed lines—the question of accountability often hinges on complex engineering determinations. Attorneys involved in such cases must decipher whether the physical infrastructure met accepted industry standards, whether maintenance practices were reasonable, and whether specific electrical components contributed to the harm. In such matters, electrical engineer expert witnesses play a pivotal role in bridging technical failures with legal theories of liability, negligence, and causation.
Analyzing Causes of Utility Litigation
When Overhead Lines Become Legal Evidence
Overhead transmission lines are among the most visible and legally scrutinized aspects of utility infrastructure. The IEEE 524-2016 standard, “Guide for the Installation of Overhead Transmission Line Conductors,” sets forth best practices for stringing, sag calculations, tensioning, and use of equipment during installation. It is not uncommon for incidents involving contact with energized lines, pole-top collapses, or structural failure during storms to stem from deviations from these practices.
In a litigation context, the presence or absence of compliance with IEEE 524 can offer clear lines of argument. An electrical engineer expert witness may examine whether the utility used the correct conductor tensioning methods, whether sag was calculated in accordance with load tables, or whether outdated or inappropriate tools were used during installation. Each of these elements can influence the physical integrity of the line, especially under dynamic conditions such as wind, ice loading, or thermal expansion. These technical failures often map directly to legal claims of negligent construction or failure analysis.
National Electrical Safety Code (NESC): The Legal Benchmark for Utility Safety
The National Electrical Safety Code (IEEE C2-2023) provides a widely adopted framework for safety in the design, operation, and maintenance of electric utility systems. Its provisions are referenced by public utility commissions and form the regulatory basis for enforcement in over 90% of U.S. states. Importantly, the NESC is not a design manual but a baseline of enforceable safety rules, often cited in litigation involving contact injuries, vehicular collisions with poles, and disputes over utility pole right-of-way conflicts.
The 2023 edition of the NESC (National Electrical Safety Code) introduced updates particularly relevant to modern utility operations, such as revised clearances for wireless equipment, inclusion of distributed generation facilities, and updated structural loading maps based on the latest ASCE models. For attorneys, these changes mean that prior installations may no longer comply with current clearance requirements, raising questions of grandfathering, retroactive duty, or known hazards under evolving standards. An electrical engineer expert witness versed in both historical and current NESC editions can offer critical context in evaluating whether a utility or contractor exercised due diligence under prevailing norms at the time of the incident.
NESC’s Role in Utility Safety
Work Rule Integration with OSHA and Industry Guidelines
The NESC also integrates with OSHA 1910 regulations and incorporates elements from standards such as IEEE 1584 for arc flash calculations and ATIS 0600040 for Fault Managed Power Systems (FMPS). These crosswalks are important when evaluating utility worker safety, especially in cases involving serious injury or wrongful death claims. An electrical engineer expert witness analysis clarifies whether employers adhered to harmonized requirements, including clearance distances, grounding protocols, and conductor handling techniques.
Connector Failures and the ANSI C119 Standard Series
Failures in splices, connectors, and mechanical joints often serve as the root cause of electrical incidents. The ANSI C119 family of standards—particularly ANSI C119.0 and C119.4—provides testing protocols and performance criteria for utility-grade connectors, including aluminum-to-aluminum and aluminum-to-copper joints. These standards specify current cycle testing, fault current endurance, corrosion resistance, and mechanical load thresholds. In litigation, these benchmarks are vital when evaluating product failures or allegations of improper installation.
For instance, a case involving a downed conductor that sparked a fire may involve post-incident inspection of splice integrity. If the connector shows signs of thermal fatigue, improper torque, or corrosion beyond rated limits, an electrical engineer expert witness can trace the failure back to a breach of ANSI-defined performance. Conversely, if testing reveals the connector met all applicable criteria, liability may shift toward improper handling or unrelated environmental stressors. These distinctions are key in claims involving negligence, contributory fault, or indemnity between parties.
ANSI C119 Standards for Utility Connectors
Advanced Testing and Documentation Methods
ANSI C119.0 also establishes requirements for the instruments and methods used during qualification testing. For example, resistance measurement systems must be accurate to ±1%, and thermal readings must resolve within 0.1°C. These stringent conditions are critical when reproducing field failure modes in laboratory settings. Attorneys should be aware that deviation from these methods can compromise the admissibility or credibility of findings. Electrical engineer expert witnesses who adhere to these standardized procedures provide greater confidence that their conclusions will withstand legal scrutiny and cross-examination.
Case Applications: Engineering Standards in Action
Discovery Engineering’s case experience demonstrates how utility-related incidents are often multi-factorial, involving design, installation, product integrity, and environmental exposure. In one example, a fatal motorist incident involved a utility pole and overhead cables spanning a roadway. Evaluation of the installation against NESC (National Electrical Safety Code) clearance rules and IEEE 524 stringing practices allowed for a technical determination of whether the infrastructure conformed to safety expectations. In another case, the electrocution of a communications lineman installing fiber cable near live power lines necessitated a review of joint-use agreements, ground clearance compliance, and proper coordination between power and telecom utilities.
These cases underscore the importance of integrating multiple standards to develop a comprehensive opinion. NESC may establish baseline safety rules, IEEE 524 guides proper construction, and ANSI C119 evaluates whether the mechanical and thermal integrity of components contributed to the event. An electrical engineer expert witness familiar with all three frameworks can tie together failure points in a manner that aligns with both technical causation and legal responsibility.
Expert Witnesses and Litigation Strategy
Electrical engineer expert witnesses are not just technical translators; they are integral to developing litigation strategy. In utility-related cases, they assist counsel in framing discovery requests, identifying document retention obligations, and preparing deposition questions that explore deviations from engineering standards. Their ability to test or simulate failures using industry-recognized standards can validate or refute claims made by opposing parties or manufacturers. Moreover, a well-supported expert witness report that references IEEE, ANSI, or NESC standards is more likely to survive Daubert or Frye challenges and carry weight with judges and juries.
Attorneys should consider retaining experts early in utility-related cases, particularly when failure analysis, product performance, or regulatory compliance will shape the theory of liability. Electrical engineer expert witnesses can help anticipate opposing arguments, assess the strength of technical documentation, and provide credible narratives that withstand the rigors of litigation.
The Role of Electrical Engineers in Litigation
Standards-Based Analysis as the Backbone of Utility Case Resolution
Utility infrastructure litigation requires more than anecdotal accounts or speculative theories. It demands a disciplined application of industry standards, technical testing, and engineering reasoning. IEEE 524, NESC C2-2023, and ANSI C119 each play distinct but complementary roles in shaping how expert witnesses evaluate conductors, installations, and connectors. Attorneys who understand how these standards intersect with legal concepts of duty, breach, and causation are better equipped to advocate for their clients—whether on behalf of a municipality, a utility, an injured worker, or an equipment manufacturer.
Engineering accountability is not an abstract concept. It is codified in the same standards that utilities use to design and maintain their systems. When these standards are properly leveraged in litigation, they provide a clear, objective path toward determining what went wrong—and who is responsible.
